Nutrient Trading and the Implications on Mid-Atlantic Waters
March 22, 2007
Frederick, MD
While water quality credit trading can produce economic and water quality benefits, it may not be the best solution in every watershed. Designing trading programs to achieve desired outcomes and ensuring that they accurately measure those outcomes is a key to successful implementation. This workshop will introduce the audience to the theory of water quality credit trading, its goals, and the implications of putting trading into practice on Mid-Atlantic waters. Presentations will also provide updates on efforts to develop trading programs in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and suggest the neccessary steps to make these programs successful.
Agenda
Presentations
- Why Trading? Why Now?
Doug Lipton, University of Maryland - Key Economic Ideas for Water Quality Trading Programs
Marc Ribaudo, USDA – Economic Research Service - Assessing Outcomes of Water Quality Trading Programs
Doug Parker, University of Maryland - Alternative Nonpoint Source Trading Partners
Kurt Stephenson, Virginia Tech - WQT: Moving to Practice with Limited Science
Jim Shortle, Penn State University - Trading Implications for Tributary Strategies
Russ Perkinson, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation - EPA Trading Policy
Ginny Kibler, US Environmental Protection Agency - Market-based Conservation
Carl Lucero, USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service - Virginia and Pennsylvania Nutrient Trading Programs
Jim Pease, Virginia Tech - Necessary Conditions for P/NP Nutrient Credit Trading
Dennis King, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
